Wednesday, 18 January 2012

Blood and narrative: the synaesthetic world

On Monday night, John Burnside won the T.S. Eliot prize for his latest collection 'Black Cat Bone', which also gained him The Forward Prize in October 2011. The word most often used to describe Burnside's work, it seems, is 'liminality' and it was no surprise to see The Guardian in September hailing 'Black Cat Bone' as a "tour de force of liminal expression". It's true that Burnside's narrators often occupy a melancholy no-man's land, somewhere between love and fear, between forest and village, between pursuit and capture. The character in the opening poem, 'The Fair Chase' is engaged in a hunt that leads him to nothing, leaves him trapped in

a search for something I could never name
the blue of a smile, or the curious 
pleasure of the doomed as they go under...

Lost childhoods, things 'glimpsed / but never really seen' ('Loved and Lost'), sinister worlds 'known since girlhood', presences that can only be guarded by being buried all stalk the pages of Burnside's new book. The world is expressed as its own negative. As Burnside says in 'Creaturely', 'the only gift is knowing we belong to nothing.' The metaphors Burnside uses to evoke this ‘other-world’ in his poetry are shadowy themselves, their vehicles vague, or sometimes even impossibilities, as in ‘Hearsay’:

At the back of my mind there is always
the freight-line that no longer runs
in a powder of snow

In a sense, Burnside’s are negative metaphors, relations between things that are often beyond our conception. In a 1970 study of Proust, Kamber and Macksey define negative metaphors as those in which an initially posited sensation moves towards an imaginary one; not rooting sensations in the known world, but moving beyond it. In Burnside’s metaphors, sometimes both tenor and vehicle are elusive or imaginary. 

Yet there's something dissatisfyingly vague about the term 'liminal' in relation to Burnside's work. I think the power of 'Black Cat Bone' partly lies in something of neuroscientific interest, in the phenomenon of synaesthesia. Recent work by V.S. Ramachandran has brought synaesthesia, the "perceptual experience by which stimuli presented through one modality will spontaneously evoke sensations in an unrelated modality" into the spotlight. Previously regarded as an epiphenomenon or even an illusion, synaesthesia has now been established as a neural condition with a genetic component, believed to affect between 2-4% of the population. Synaesthesia, Ramachandran believes, is the result of 'cross-activations' between different areas of the brain (most commonly, number and colour V4 areas, which are adjacent) as a result of defective neural pruning, leaving the synesthete with an excess of neural connections. Most intriguingly, Ramachandran proposes that synaesthesia - otherwise a trait of limited utility - remains in populations because of its relationship to metaphor. Unsurprisingly, synaesthesia is more common amongst artists and the cross-activations it involves are conducive to creative thought.

The poet John Kinsella, who withdrew from this year's T.S. Eliot prize is a synesthete and has written about some of his sensory experiences. Regardless of whether individual writers may benefit from the cross-activations of synaesthesia, I'd argue that a number of interesting poetic images try to emulate (and therefore stimulate) the synaesthetic process in the reader. 'Black Cat Bone' is a deeply synaesthetic collection. Burnside is fond of strange sensory pairings and his latest collection is teeming with them: 'musk and terror', 'blood-warmth and pollen', 'gunsmoke and cyan', 'blood and narrative', 'hymns / and ghost towns' the 'moss and curvature / of nightfall', or the 'tinnitus of longing'. Burnside's ghost-couplings often pair unlikely sensory qualities and surprise us with how right these seem. There's an easy profundity about some of these pairs at times, a sense of mystery-achieved-too-easily, perhaps, which isn't as present in his earlier collections.

Sometimes, these sensory transmutations are strikingly vivid. In 'Transfiguration' the final description of 'blood exchanged for fire' and 'thoughts for stone' shocks us with a near-physical force. It's strange, then, that what these images finally leave us with is a tantalising sense of 'something like the absence of ourselves / from our own lives' ('The Listener'). Their imprecision often gives them a paradoxical resonance.

As Ramachandran argues, we are all synaesthetes on a very basic level (language itself being a kind of synaesthesia). More than that, I'd say poetry readers long for the kind of rich, sensory experiences that some synaesthetes report. Luckily, we can approximate them or invent our own through the strange, absorbing imaginative experiences poetry affords us. But don't take my word for it. To experience the strange alchemy of 'Black Cat Bone' for yourself, you can hear John Burnside reading some of the poems from it here.

6 comments:

  1. Helen, thanks for this, it's VERY interesting.

    Naturally, been thinking a lot over the past few days about my own responses to poetry - and different kinds of poetry, especially when I had to write up the eight TS Eliot prize readers! The first one that seemed to reach my frequency was indeed Burnside, who began with the line 'May, and already it's autumn.'

    Maybe paradox aacts in a syneasthetic way, and maybe poetry is where two things can be the same thing - or one thing can be something else too. It may be that if you have a relatively synaesthesiac brain, you need certain levels of stimulation, or you need juxtapositions, or internal-visual depictions...

    I also find the colours of letters - that is, a textural, physical quality to them, and a visual basis for their interaction - integral to my writing, I think.

    And btw I hate looking at pictures of other people's synaesthesia colours - they never tally, and wrong combinations can be almost painful like a bright light. But those above are not far off mine, especially with the yellow 2. Funny, huh!

    Thinking... thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The University of Greenwich are currently researching the effect of drugs on synaesthesia (which, aside from poetry, is the other time-honoured route for the non-gifted)...take part in the survey here:

      https://greenwichuniversity.eu.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_bCW3OZwywP7IeNu

      Delete
  2. PS next time you're over visiting Alan do let us know - as a fellow McGilchristian I'm sure we've lots to muse about! We're dog-friendly too...x

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks, Andy, that looks fascinating. Yes, I was reading recently about LCD-induced, temporary synaesthesia. It seems to me the fact that it can be induced must have quite important implications for how we understand its neural basis (though that's stating the bleeding obvious).

    Katy, I was really taken with what you said about poetry being where two things can be the same thing. It makes me think of a psychoanalyst / philosopher called Ignacio Matte Blanco (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignacio_Matte_Blanco for when Wikipedia is up and running again!) and his concept of the 'indivisible world'.

    I'd never thought about that: of course it must be deeply annoying if synesthetes see colours matched with other things in a way that doesn't accord with their own particular colour schema, how interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh, and I'd love to come and visit next time I'm in Oxford, thank you, it'd be great to have a chat about all these various ideas and more. Going to try to come down to see Alan towards the end of Feb, all being well so I'll let you know!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Really enjoyed your post Helen. Fantastic collection. There's always something just out of our line of sight, but we know it's there, something recognisable but unnameable.
    'It seems a fable and perhaps it is:
    we live in peril, die from happenstance...'
    A man 'might slide towards an old /belonging'...
    'skate forever, slithering as he goes
    but hazarding a guess that someone else
    is close beside him, other to his other.'

    ReplyDelete